首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
【2h】

Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)

机译:后路开孔术与前路开孔术与融合术治疗颈椎椎间孔狭窄的比较:一项随机对照试验(ForaC)的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Cervical radiculopathy caused by spondylotic foraminal stenosis may require surgical treatment. Surgical options include anterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Controversy remains regarding the preferable surgical approach. Pertinent clinical evidence is limited to low-quality observational reports. Therefore, treatment decisions are predominantly based on the individual surgeon’s preference and skill. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior foraminotomy in comparison to anterior foraminotomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic foraminal stenosis. Methods/design: This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel group superiority trial. A total of 88 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. Sample size and power calculations were performed to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 14 points, with an expected standard deviation of 20 in the primary outcome parameter, Neck Disability Index, with a power of 80%, based on an assumed maximal dropout rate of 20%. Secondary outcome parameters include the Core Outcome Measures Index, which investigates pain, back-specific function, work disability, social disability and patient satisfaction. Changes in physical and mental health are evaluated using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Moreover, radiological and health economic outcomes are evaluated. Follow-up is performed 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery. Major inclusion criteria are cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis causing radiculopathy of C5, C6 or C7 and requiring decompression of one or two neuroforaminae. Study data generation (study sites) and data storage, processing and statistical analysis (Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics) are clearly separated. Data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: The results of the ForaC study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for spondylotic foraminal stenosis and will contribute to the understanding of its short- and long-term clinical and radiological postoperative course. This will hopefully translate into improvements in surgical treatment and thus, clinical practice for spondylotic foraminal stenosis. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN82578069
机译:背景:脊柱椎间孔狭窄引起的颈神经根病可能需要手术治疗。手术选择包括前颈椎间孔切开术和融合术或后颈椎间孔切开术。关于首选手术方法仍存在争议。相关的临床证据仅限于低质量的观察报告。因此,治疗决策主要取决于个别外科医生的偏好和技能。该研究的目的是评估后路椎间孔切开术与前路椎间孔切开术融合术治疗脊椎椎间孔狭窄的疗效和安全性。方法/设计:这是一项多中心随机,对照,平行分组优势试验。共有88位成年患者按1:1的比例分配。进行样本量和功效计算以检测14个点的最小临床重要差异,主要结局参数Neck Disability Index的预期标准偏差为20,功效为80%(基于假定的最大辍学率)。 20%。次要结果参数包括核心成果衡量指标,该指标调查疼痛,背部特定功能,工作障碍,社交障碍和患者满意度。使用Short Form-12(SF-12)问卷评估身体和心理健康的变化。此外,还对放射和卫生经济成果进行了评估。术后3、6、12、24、36、48和60个月进行随访。纳入的主要标准是引起C5,C6或C7神经根病并需要减压一或两个神经孔的颈椎型椎间孔狭窄。研究数据生成(研究地点)与数据存储,处理和统计分析(医学统计学,信息学和卫生经济学系)明确分开。数据将根据意向性处理原则进行分析。讨论:ForaC研究的结果将为脊椎椎间孔狭窄提供手术治疗建议,并有助于了解其短期和长期的临床和放射术后过程。这有望转化为手术治疗的改善,从而改善脊椎椎间孔狭窄的临床实践。试用注册当前控制的试用:ISRCTN82578069

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号